Saturday, October 16, 2004

Everton and Southampton betting.

P2P betting exchange Betfair had the following odds on offer at the time of posting. The bookmakers hate Betfair, probably because it has disrupted their cartel and continually offers better value.

Match odds:
Everton - Back at 1.78, Lay at 1.79
Southampton - Back at 6, Lay at 6.4
Draw - Back at 3.6, Lay at 3.65

Goals:
Under 2.5 - Back at 1.79, Lay at 1.78
Over 2.5 - Back at 2.24, Lay at 2.28

To win the League, from scratch:
Everton - Back at 750, Lay at 800
Southampton - Back at 1000, Lay at [no price offered]

To win the League, with handicap:
Everton +46.5 pts - Back at 4.1, Lay at 4.4
Southampton +38.5 pts - Back at 220, Lay at 390

To be relegated:
Everton - Back at 19, Lay at 28
Southampton - Back at 3.45, Lay at 3.95

To win the Carling Cup:
Everton - Back at 23, Lay at 26
Southampton - Back at 30, Lay at 55


Kick it out [corruption] a letter containing items that you may wish to reuse

Kicking it out.

Kick CORRUPTION out of football. In my opinion, corruption will be more damaging that racialism in the long run. Colin Wilkes has crafted another document for publication here. This one is in the form of a letter to the ‘All Party Football Group.’ You may wish to reuse parts of it and follow his lead.

You could make yor MP get off his/her @rse and send them your own letter, requesting an inquiry, using the data in this [below] as the bulk of the content.

In order to contact your MP quickly and efficiently, you could visit the following site and follow the instructions:

Fax Your MP

If the fans don’t help to protect their clubs and the game, those intent on corruption will have a much easier time.


-------------------

Alan Keen MP, Chair of the All Party Football Group
House of Commons London
http://www.allpartyfootballgroup.org.uk

I have no doubt you have heard many calls on previous occasions to have the game cleaned up in terms of the corruption we all know exists within our game. I give you here two examples:

1) For the BBC to exist it has at its source of funding the licence fee. I am a licence fee payer…

Most professional bodies are self regulating and as such have their own individual codes of conduct and behaviour to which individual members have to adhere or face the consequences. This is applicable throughout industry and commercial organisations and throughout the public and private sectors of the economy . Those elements that fail in their self regulatory functions have and will continue to have
regulations forced upon them by the law of the land

It would be fair to assume that the BBC has such as system of checks and balances in place to avoid any possible conflict of interest arising that may damage the public’s image of the BBC and or the individuals concerned and the mass of the public who are the providers of funding for the BBC and its continued existence.

So why is it that a person who holds 300,000 (three hundred thousand) shares in Proactive Sports Management and therefore has a vested interest in the sale of Wayne Rooney can whilst being a BBC football pundit state on the BBC television, that Wayne Rooney should leave Everton football club and sign for another irregardless of who the other club maybe. There is here most certainly a conflict
of interest as the said pundit Mr Peter Schmeichel stood to gain a great deal financially from any sale of Wayne Rooney.

So has there been a failure in the mechanisms used by the BBC or has a blind eye been turned to facilitate Mr Schmeichel's greed. Has there been a breach of the BBC checks and balances? Its time for the BBC to give an explanation and as this is the year when funding renewal is being examined I trust it better be a good explanation and that this matter and its like will not be allowed to materialise and manifest in the future

If this matter was to arise within industry or the world of commerce then the offending person would have been dealt with by now.

I have on twenty four separate occasions emailed the BBC on this subject and have received only auto generated responses. I have also contacted Dave Watts my MP on the matter but have waited over two weeks for any further information.

2) In a recent Blackmail Trial at Warrington Crown Court the football agent of Wayne Rooney, Mr Paul Stretford told the court he did not start to represent Rooney until December 2002. Documentation later showed he in fact had started to represent Rooney in the September of 2002. A period of over three months prior to Rooney’s existing contract with his former agent coming to an end. This is a clear breach of the regulations that both FIFA and our own FA set out for football agents.

The agents’ code of conduct set out by FIFA and the FA clearly state
"IV.
The players' agent shall, without fail, respect the rights of his negotiating partners and third parties. In particular, he shall respect the contractual relations of his professional colleagues and shall refrain from any action that could entice clients away from
other parties."

FIFA also state:
"General Rules
Art. 2
The applicant must have an impeccable reputation otherwise his application will be disregarded. The national association concerned shall decide whether the applicant fulfils the basic requirements in accordance with the national legislation of the country concerned."

There is no doubt in my mind that this person Paul Stretford had poached Wayne Rooney as his own documentation has proved. And if he has perjured himself in the crown court, which Cheshire Police are investigating as to whether or not to bring charges, then he is most certainly not of impeccable reputation.

Having contacted the FA on this matter I find myself yet again being the recipient of an auto generated response. This has made me, at great cost, to phone them directly. However all I have heard in reply is they are not prepared to comment. OK so there
may be something ongoing but on the other hand someone may just be trying to sweep it under the carpet .

I have given you here two clear examples of corruption in our game. The finances of the game are stretched, as you well know, to the extreme limits for most clubs. What we don't need is the likes of Stretford, Schmeichel and their ilk siphoning off huge amounts of monies that will never return to the clubs and or increasing their personal wealth at the expense of the supporters. It is the supporters who provide the main source of income for most clubs. And is us supporters who because of these people, have to pay an ever increasing amount to enjoy what we love doing, SUPPORT OUR OWN TEAMS. Saturation point is not far away.

It is with all the above points in mind that I ask you to circulate this email to your colleagues on the All Party Football Group. With the intention to seek an inquiry into the single aspect of corruption that exists within our game before it is swallowed up and devoured by the greed of the few.

Yours Sincerely
Colin Wilkes
---------------------------------

Friday, October 15, 2004

News in 60 secs. and Liverpool's Tram fiasco rumbles on

As promised last night, here's a quick summary, of most, if not all, of the main goings-on since the aftermath of the Spurs game.

Cahill

Despite the atrocious 'tackle' connecting with his leg, it was not to be a recurrence of the old knee injury for Cahill.

Ready Eddie?

Eddie Bosnar scored the winner [a free kick] v the shyte in the Mini Derby at the Racecourse Ground during the last week.

Something old

Li Tie back in full training after his shin break.

Something new

Against much competition, we signed a new youngster from the Faroe Islands.

Something borrowed

Moyes was, unsurprisingly, awarded the 'Manager of the month' title.

This article 'Moyes offered promise of new dawn at Everton' is worth a look.

Something Blue?

Quinn has made comments about Beattie and Everton.

You may still vote for the striker you'd most like to see join in January. See the right hand side of this poage and cast your vote [assuming that they're all availiable].

Tomorrow's game.

You may vote in the prediction poll on the right hand side of this page.

Some Southampton match previews. A work-free weekend is upon me, so I'm able to go to tomorrow's match at Goodison. A free pint of Chang for anybody who spots me.

Here and here.

The betting [from Betfair] will be published here tomorrow.

International round-up, with regards to Everton players.

From the official site

Sod the people… [aka ‘Future car-parking and congestion charge income must be protected above all else.’]

In spite of 93% of the public polled on Merseyside being in favour of the Trams making a return to the city after 50 years, the City Council are apparently not keen!

The Tram project limps on, with the only consistent factors seeming to be political posturing and incompetence. Then again, perhaps the Council are not incompetent. It may be that they have considered the drop in car parking revenue and the effect upon future congestion charging plans for the city and have decided that the tram, although good for the people – many would choose to 'tram it' into town, rather than drive – would be very bad for itself, the City Council. Car parking and congestion charging revenues are and will continue to be, very big earners for the Council. An efficient tram service, running along prime routes, would adversely affect The Council's revenue from the 'mobile cash-till' that is the car driver of today and tomorrow.

It has been written before on this site, somewhat tongue in cheek, that we should expect a ‘world class car park’ on the site of the 4th [Dis]Grace. As the months pass, appalling as it would be, it is undeniably looking more likely!

More details about the problems that the tram project faces:
B E A U Ts



Thursday, October 14, 2004

Stand by your beds! Southampton prediction poll and a cartoon.

The site is waking from it's relative slumber, a week or so that saw some goal-keeping by McFad' two England victories and no goals from Rooney.

Thanks to Colin Wilkes who has played a large part in keeping the posts regular!

Between now and tomorrow night, a round-up of most of the news since the Spurs game will be collated and published, including pre-match betting and some preview links for Saturday's match, with the out-of-sorts Southampton.

For now, please make do with casting your vote in the prediction poll on the right hand side and then take a look at this very topical cartoon.

What do you think of offshoring? I was going to save this cartoon to show you in a future episode of 'Victor Meldrew's Sunday Roasting,' but couldn't resist holding it back any longer.

Click here to watch it.

You'll need to have your PC's speakers turned on.


Blackmail Trial - aftermath? [Part 2] Can FIFA now be expected to pursue Stretford?

Here is the following instalment in the series of articles by regular viewer and contributor, Colin Wilkes:

Things seem to be getting a little twisted regarding Rooney, Stretford and Proactive. Only an individual person can act as an agent of a footballer under the FA and FIFA rules

FIFA regulations clearly state:

"Art. 2

Any natural person wishing to act as a players' agent shall send a written application to the national association of the country of which he is a national or, if he lives elsewhere, to the national association of his country of domicile provided he has lived there constantly for at least two years.

The applicant must have an impeccable reputation otherwise his application will be disregarded. The national association concerned shall decide whether the applicant fulfils the basic requirements in accordance with the national legislation of the country concerned.

Only a natural person may apply for a licence. Applications from companies or clubs are not permitted."

If it is possible for a natural person to take over the reins from another natural person , in this case A.N. Other, to take over from the natural person Paul Stretford, who both belong to the same parent organisation is not clear. But it is clear that an organisation such as Proactive, Formation or INTERPOL cannot act as a football agent

However FIFA go on to state:

"Art. 8

Every candidate who has passed the examination is required to sign a Code of Professional Conduct (cf. Annexe B) in which he pledges, without fail, to abide by the basic principles described therein when acting as a players' agent.

Players' agents who fail to abide by the Code of Professional Conduct during the course of their work are liable to be sanctioned in accordance with art. 15, par. 2. "

So then what exactly is the nature of these sanctions;

" Art. 15

Players' agents who abuse the rights accorded to them or contravene any of the duties stipulated in these regulations are liable to sanctions.

The following sanctions may be pronounced:

- a caution, censure, or warning;

- a fine;

- suspension of the licence;

- withdrawal of the licence.

The sanctions may be imposed jointly.

The foregoing sanctions may be pronounced only by the national association that issued the licence to the offending players' agent or by FIFA. The delimitations of responsibility are stipulated in art. 22, par. 1 and 2 below.

The licence shall be withdrawn if the players' agent fails to fulfil any of the prerequisites for acquiring a licence stipulated under art. 2, 3, 6 and 7 (professional liability insurance or bank guarantee). If this is the case and the omission can be remedied, the appropriate body at the national association shall set him a reasonable deadline in which to reinstate compliance with the rules.

In addition to the reasons given under par. 4, the licence shall be withdrawn, in particular if the players' agent repeatedly or seriously infringes the statutes and regulations of the national associations, confederations and/or FIFA.

The licence shall be withdrawn by the national association which issued it. FIFA reserves the right to direct a national association to mandatorily withdraw a licence".

Here then quite plainly there are four sanctions which can be applied singularly or in multiples to the max of the complete four all at the same time. Though if #four was applied then there would be no need to apply #3 or so we may conclude.

FIFA regulations stipulate each individual FA shall conduct the business of examining the activities of each individual football agent;

"Art. 21

The Players' Status Committee is the supervisory and decision-making body of FIFA responsible for implementing these regulations and for ensuring that players' agents carry out their activities in compliance with the Code of Professional Conduct.

Each national association shall designate a supervisory and decision-making body responsible for the activity of players' agents for whom it has issued a licence.

This body shall ensure that the players' agents' activities at national level comply with the principles of the Code of Professional Conduct."

If there is a dispute involving a football agent then;

"Art. 22

In the event of disputes between a players' agent and a player, a club and/or another players' agent, all of whom are registered with the same national association (national disputes), the national association concerned is responsible. It is obliged to deal with the case and pass a decision, for which service it is entitled to charge an appropriate fee.

Any other complaint not covered by par. 1 shall be submitted to the FIFA Players' Status Committee.

Complaints about the work of a players' agent shall be directed in writing to the national association concerned or to FIFA within two years of the incident in question and in any case no later than six months after the players' agent concerned has terminated his activities as such."

Therefore it maybe fair to assume if A.N.Other wanted to take over the role of football agent for Wayne Rooney then it would be a decision for the FIFA Players' Status Committee.

FIFA regulations concerning the;

Annexe B: Code of Professional Conduct

IV.

The players' agent shall, without fail, respect the rights of his negotiating partners and third parties. In particular, he shall respect the contractual relations of his professional colleagues and shall refrain from any action that could entice clients away from
other parties.

V.

At the request of any authorities conducting an investigation into disciplinary cases and other disputes, the players' agent is required to produce books and records directly connected with the case in point.

The players' agent shall produce an invoice showing his fees, expenses and any other charges upon first demand from his client.

So that's it in a nutshell. If the organisations accept responsibility to pursue Stretford is another matter

--------------------------


Tuesday, October 12, 2004

Blackmail Trial - aftermath?

In case you’re not aware by now, it looks like perjury may have been out to play. See Toffeblog and comments on NSNO.

This morning, I read of rumblings within the Formation Agency [aka Proactive]. It is rumoured that they may be on the verge of ridding themselves of Stretford.

So what else may be next? The Police are looking at the court records and at least one Blue has contacted the game’s authorities, citing their very own rules and regulations.

I [and I am sure many of you] am grateful to regular viewer and contributor, ‘Good Evertonian’ [I really love that phrase], Colin Wilkes. During the ‘darker periods’ [i.e. when there is no top-flight League football], he often submits well-researched and timely articles, for us to share and certainly in my case, find educational.

Well brethren, here is the latest in the series. This letter goes right to the heart of the matter, going well beyond opinion, entertainment and education.

---------------------------------------------------

I have sent the following to the FA and later to FIFA etc

In view of what has come to light today at Warrington Crown Court re; the Paul Stretford Blackmail case, does the FA consider this man to be:

"Art. 2

The applicant must have an impeccable reputation otherwise his application will be disregarded. The national association concerned shall decide whether the applicant fulfils the basic requirements in accordance with the national legislation of the country concerned."

Your Regulations and those of FIFA

I refer here to his PURJURY in court whilst under oath.

Additionally the agent Paul Stretford has broken both FIFA and the FA rules by having poached and represented Wayne Rooney prior to the expiry of his contract. The original contract was to expire in December 2002 Stretford was representing Rooney from September 2002

"Art. 11

A licensed players' agent has the right:

to contact every player who is not, or is no longer, under contract with a club (cf. art. 12 and 13 of the FIFA Regulations for the Status and Transfers of Players);"

"Art. 14

A licensed players' agent is required:

to adhere, without fail, to the statutes and regulations of the national associations, confederations and FIFA;"

"Annexe B: Code of Professional Conduct

I.

The players' agent is required to perform his occupation conscientiously and conduct himself in his profession and other business practices in a manner worthy of respect and befitting his profession.

II.

The players' agent shall adhere to the truth, clarity and objectivity in his dealings with his client, negotiating partners and other parties"

All the above are part and parcel of the regulations of both FIFA and the FA
It is therefore patently obvious these regulations have been breached by Paul Stretford.

Now is the time to take action and strike him and his cohorts at Proactive aka the ‘Formation’ group off the list of accredited football agents in England.

This is surely the opportunity and time to have a full and open investigation into the murky world of the football agent in England and you can also ask FIFA to conduct a similar exercise throughout the rest of the world

I look towards a swift and positive response
Sincerely
Colin Wilkes


Monday, October 11, 2004

The Rooney Imbroglio: 'The Blackmail Trial' - The first 7 days' jigsaw pieced together complete with the very latest, definitive postings.

If you're anything like me, you view legal proceedings as clearly as if they were undertaken within a pool of lentil soup. For the following Evertonians, we should all be grateful. They have simplified a very complex affair.

In an attempt to help to clear the mud for the [intellectually-speaking] 'Average Joe's' amongst us, regular viewer and contributor, Colin Wilkes has collated the information available, in order to create a clear record of proceedings.

At the end of Colin's article there is a page break and then a link to a site that, in many ways, expands upon and continues, where Colin's piece leaves-off.

I regard ToffeeBlog/Web as being the definitive resources in relation to this affair. In conjunction with Colin's post, for me, this trio, just about sum the whole business up.

Is it any surprise that Proactive have recently changed their name?

----------------------------------------------

Without prejudice.

Based upon information freely available in the
public domain.

----------------------------------------------

THE BLACKMAIL TRIAL

THE FIRST 7 DAYS; PIECING THE JIGSAW TOGETHER

In an attempt to clarify some of the events, of the trial, I have copied and pasted the reported proceedings from; The BBC website, The Liverpool Echo, The Guardian, The Independent and The Scotsman. Links to all the articles can be found on the TOFFEEBLOG site and The TOFFEEWEB site. Thanks to those two sites for keeping those links live.

Boxing promoter, John Hyland and brothers Christopher and Anthony Bacon deny demanding money with menaces from Mr Stretford, in June 2003. The three defendants are alleged to have tried to force Mr Stretford into signing a contract in which he would pay over a large cut of his future Rooney earnings.

DAY 5

Mr Rooney had been a client of the Proform agency, run by the Liverpool agent Peter McIntosh. In June 2002, the Rooneys decided Wayne should join Mr Stretford's Proactive agency when his contract expired at the end of that year.

Pro-Form, which had since been merged with the X8 sports agency, objected. Mr Stretford said he had offered to buy out their interest in Rooney for £5,000 but the offer was rejected.

Mr Stretford told the court that from November 2002 until June 2003, he attended meetings with Mr Hyland and Dave Lockwood, whose X8 sports agency had bought Proform.

Similar meetings with John Hyland and others followed, in which Mr Stretford upped his offer of buying out X8's interest in Rooney to £25,000, plus a cut of his commissions

ON DAY 1

The trial, in Warrington Crown Court, was adjourned after a new witness, William Lindfield, came forward as late as Monday morning. Lord Carlile QC, representing Mr Hyland, said Mr Lindfield would testify that he drove Mr Stretford to the meeting in November 2002, during which he stayed in the car to look after the cash. Lord Carlile said Mr Lindfield's evidence was that he had been hired to drive Paul Stretford to the meeting with Mr Hyland at the Moss Nook restaurant, near Manchester Airport, on 4 November 2002, and Mr Stretford had £250,000 cash with him in a bag.

"Paul Stretford said he hoped to use this money as a pay off to John Hyland,"

Lord Carlile went on:

"Mr Lindfield sat in the car looking after the cash throughout the assignation."

Lord Carlile told the judge, His Honour David Hale, that Rooney had signed a two-year contract with Mr McIntosh in December 2000. He said:

"It is part of our case that Paul Stretford offered cash to John Hyland [in November 2002, during this period] but the money did not change hands.

ON DAY 5

By December 12, 2002, Mr Stretford said he had agreed to a 50-50 split of his net profits on Rooney for three years but still his offer was refused.

ON DAY 3

The court today heard evidence from Wayne Rooney's father, Thomas.

He said he had been happy with the work of Proform in representing his son but had decided to switch to Stretford's company.

He said:

"We decided Wayne would be better off in their hands. They seemed a more professional company."

He wrote to Proform in June 2002 declaring his intention not to renew Wayne's two-year contract with them from December 2002

Under cross-examination by Hyland's barrister, Lord Carlile QC, Mr Rooney confirmed that Wayne's original agent Peter McIntosh had seen the young star on an almost weekly basis to check on his needs.

He also denied that the legendary Liverpool footballer Kenny Dalglish had played any part in persuading them to join Proactive.

Mr Rooney said he was not aware that Dalglish had two million shares in Proactive and insisted the former Scottish international had never visited Rooney's Croxteth home to talk to them.

He said Dalglish had telephoned him once and suggested joining a new agency but had not mentioned Proactive.

Asked by Lord Carlile if he and Mr Stretford had deliberately decided to keep Dalglish's name out of the case, Mr Rooney said:

"No."

ON DAY 4

Mr Rooney said he had not been recommended to see Mr Dooley by Mr Stretford or anyone else at Proactive.

ON DAY 7

Lord Carlile also grilled Mr Stretford on why he had recommended that the Rooney family take legal advice from a Liverpool solicitor called Kevin Dooley, who at that time was under investigation for defrauding his clients and was later struck off.

Mr Stretford insisted he had not known that Kevin Dooley had been under investigation and that he had not seen media reports on the matter.

He said he had chosen to recommend Mr Dooley after discussions with Kenny Dalglish, and told the jury that he did not regret that choice.

ON DAY 5

From November, 2002 until June, 2003, he attended a series of meetings with Dave Lockwood and John Hyland, of X8, to try to negotiate a settlement.

The court heard that the first meeting, in a hotel near Heathrow Airport, was arranged by Liverpool FC legend and Proactive shareholder Kenny Dalglish.

Mr Stretford attended and was immediately introduced to Tommy Adams, a man he told the jury he understood to be a "London villain".

He was then ushered into a club room, where John Hyland, Dave Lockwood and Peter McIntosh were waiting.

Mr Dalglish, one of Liverpool's finest former players, asked London man [with a criminal conviction], Tommy Adams, to help the football agent Paul Stretford deal with demands for a share of profits from Rooney's former agent, Peter McIntosh and associates.

But Mr Stretford felt "let down" by Mr Dalglish's offer

During cross-examination, Mr Hyland's barrister, Lord Carlisle, said Dalglish had invited Mr Adams. He said:

"You felt let down by him [Dalglish] because he arranged to bring to the meeting a notorious gangster who had recently finished a sentence of seven-and-a-half years' imprisonment for importing cannabis, and who takes an interest in sport."

Mr Hyland and others became angry that Mr Stretford would not agree to a deal on their terms.

Lord Carlisle told the jury that the police had asked Dalglish to provide a statement about the meeting and he had refused. He asked Mr Stretford:

"Do you feel let down by him?"

"Of course." replied Mr Stretford.

On day 7

Lord Carlile said:

"You knew full well that Kenny Dalglish had engineered for one of his unsavoury friends to come and facilitate this meeting. It was you who brought in the heavy mob, wasn't it?"

Mr Stretford replied:

"Absolutely not."

Mr Stretford told the jury that "fear and confusion" prevented him from leaving the meeting when he saw who was present.

Mr Stretford had told police that Tommy Adams had said to him that 'he understood there was a problem, a matter that needed to be sorted out for everyone's benefit and that he had been brought in merely to arbitrate'.

Lord Carlile asked him why he did not use a formal sporting tribunal, which is staffed by legal professionals, rather than "people who have just emerged from seven-and-a-half years' imprisonment imposed by the Old Bailey and have reputations as one of London's leading gangsters".

Mr Stretford repeated that he had not known who would be present at the meeting.
He told the jury that he did not ask Mr Dalglish why it was to be held in London or who would be attending.

-------end of Colin Wilkes article----------------------

The following link will tke you to ToffeBlog, where you will be able to read postings relating to all stages of the trial, including the most recent postings from today.

Thanks to Colin, ToffeeWeb and ToffeeBlog, we should all be a lot clearer about this important matter.


blogville Fides Invicta Cardinal Heenan Camping UK Recommended holiday destination: 'South Lakeland Cabin' Free Google Page Rank Checker